« Beautiful Internet... Beautiful Caselaw? | Main | New Baby »

Fixing Social Content Sites

I agree wholeheartedly with Dharmesh Shah’s assessment of social content sites like Digg. The problem is the content–-it's completely random, and while often interesting, it is NOT particularly relevant to me.

To illustrate, check out the current headlines on Digg:

Stolen Homer Simpson Statue Found

Like I said, these stories are random, interesting, but not particularly relevant to me. The social content sites have responded by creating story categories (e.g., entertainment, technology, sports), BUT they really can’t slice the content narrow enough to solve the relevance problem.

How do you fix this?

One idea is to create a PLATFORM, where users can create social news site pages containing content relevant to any type of vertical market. The content on these pages could be anything from all things labradoodle for labradoodle lovers, Notre Dame Football for Notre Dame fans, a local political candidate for supporters, GTD, even a nucleotide of interest to particular group of researchers. Content within these user created, vertical market sites would be voted upon just like Digg, Reddit, Truemors, thereby incorporating the value of the wisdom of crowds.

There are those out there trying to create this PLATFORM, (e.g., coRank), but I think a MUCH less complex model would be much more viral. I envision a basic site where...

  1. users can create their own pages using the platform;
  2. news stories are listed in two basic categories: the latest (the latest submissions), and the greatest (the voted upon results); and
  3. the site would allow for interaction among users (e.g., comments, chat, forum clouds, meetups)

The content on these sites would be VERY relevant to its users, because unlike the other social content sites out there, you’ve gone one step further and empowered the users to create the categories. This is taking user generated content to another level.

There is a bit of a dilemma here: as you increase focus and thereby increase relevancy, such focus may cause a site to fall below the critical mass of users required to keep it going. This dilemma might be able to be bridged. For example, it may help in such situations for the "latest" stories to auto-propogate with content based upon user defined Google News Alert keywords, and then the voters could take over.

Austin based startup Thoof may be building something that principally meets some of what I've described above. We'll have to wait and see.

If you're a startup trying to build something along these lines I'd love to talk.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454cea769e200e0098486258833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fixing Social Content Sites:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thanks for the reference to coRank - Just to add to your suggestions, regarding what's possible or not in coRank:

1. users can create their own pages using the platform;

That's already possible, if I understand it correctly.

2. news stories are listed in two basic categories: the latest (the latest submissions), and the greatest (the voted upon results);

We have that. It's true that there's more than just that and you were advocating for simplicity, but in those custom sites created by virtue of your 1st request, there are options to add/remove wanted/unwanted features.

3. the site would allow for interaction among users (e.g., comments, chat, forum clouds, meetups)

This is coming, starting with basic p2p contact tools based on existing relationships (you also dont want a 100% open environment or spammers would take over it in a second).

As for Thoof, from what I've read, their main differentiating factor is that anyone can edit submitted stories, wiki style, which is certainly different from what we're trying to do at coRank.

Thanks for your comment RBA. I am looking forward to seeing how coRank evolves over time.

I guess my only question of coRank is whether it is really usable by the masses. Is it easy enough to be appealing to the Facebook/Myspace crowd?

Thanks for citing the article.

I'm also trying to address the issue/opportunity with some new software.

An example of the software can be seen at:

http://www.DailyHub.com

This particular site is a social content site for business geeks. But, the idea is that similar sites could be created on any niche topic.

The software is still very, very early but those interested in the general thesis can read the manifesto page. It describes the motivation and philosophy for the platform.

Thanks Dharmesh.

Hi, I'm the CEO of Thoof - feel free to email me if you would like an invite (if you don't already have one).

You may be interested in this information on our personalized selection algorithm:

http://blog.thoof.com/?p=6

All the best,

Ian.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

  • View Ryan Howell's profile on LinkedIn

Disclaimer

  • Nothing herein shall be deemed legal advice, nor shall it create an attorney-client relationship. Postings are believed accurate when made, but may not be complete; are not updated, reviewed or revised on a regular basis; and may not apply to your particular circumstances. For legal advice, retain an attorney in your jurisdiction. None of the contents of this blog are intended as attorney advertising, nor as solicitation for legal services, in any jurisdiction where this site does not comply with all of the laws, rules, regulations, and ethical mandates of that jurisdiction.

Read Recently