« Happy 2008! It’s Time to Update Your Copyright Notices | Main | .Mac vs. Google Apps »

2008 Will Be the Year of Google Apps

2008 will be a breakout year for Google Apps. Here are 5 reasons why:

  1. GDrive/Platypus will go live, allowing Google Apps users to store  their files online. The current backup and file sync solutions on the market are frustrating. While there are a few notable exceptions (Mozy, Memeo),  no one has put together the gamechanging solution. Google Apps will do this in 2008, and it will be integrated with the Google suite of products (e.g., Gmail, Google Docs, etc.). It is useful to note that M$ is scrambling towards its own solution in Live Drive, but as long as it continues to take a "one foot in, one foot out" approach in their commitment to Live Drive they will not beat Google. (Come on M$, you've been sitting on Foldershare and Groove for years without getting fully behind either!)
  2. JotSpot, acquired by Google over a year ago, will finally go live as a key piece of Google Apps. Hopefully, the delayed integration means that it will be robust. I expect to see a something akin to a JotSpot-Basecamp mashup with a dash of Google ingenuity, and of course it will be well integrated with all of the other Google Apps tools.
  3. Postini - When Google acquired Postini last year, it sent a strong message to me (and to others) that Google is indeed building a enterprise capable application in Google Apps. This acquisition gives Google a competitive advantage and legitimacy. Postini allows Google to sell Apps not only as a viable, but market leading enterprise solution when it comes to managing communications.
  4. M$ Exchange is TOO much for most organizations. Why is it that if all I want to do is to keep my Outlook in sync between a few computers and my smartphone, I have to use this beast of a program? Not only is M$ Exchange too feature rich for most organizations, it is also very expensive to both setup and then manage. Conversely, Google Apps provides the most commonly used features from Exchange (e.g., shared address books and calendars), but they manage it, and it's available for a fraction of the price.
  5. Security and Privacy concerns are overblown. It's a bit scary to make your organization so Google-dependent, but consider the following: A) For many businesses, moving to Google Apps represents an increase in security and stability. Why? Security and stability are the sine qua non of Google's business and they know it; they allocate their tremendous resources accordingly. B) As Facebook has reminded us over the past few months, privacy is a costs benefits analysis. If Google provides killer applications at unmatched prices, (which they do), organizations may grit their teeth a bit, but will ultimately trust Google to follow their informal corporate motto, "Don't be Evil."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/533167/24922420

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 2008 Will Be the Year of Google Apps:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I'll be in head first when Google buys Wesabe or Mint and lets me do my finances online.

Your comments link wasn't working on the Pocket Audit post, so I'll leave the link for "The Jimi" here: http://www.thejimi.com/

Got mine six months ago and haven't looked back.

Post a comment

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

  • View Ryan Howell's profile on LinkedIn

Disclaimer

  • Nothing herein shall be deemed legal advice, nor shall it create an attorney-client relationship. Postings are believed accurate when made, but may not be complete; are not updated, reviewed or revised on a regular basis; and may not apply to your particular circumstances. For legal advice, retain an attorney in your jurisdiction. None of the contents of this blog are intended as attorney advertising, nor as solicitation for legal services, in any jurisdiction where this site does not comply with all of the laws, rules, regulations, and ethical mandates of that jurisdiction.

Read Recently